Biblical Theism Defended

This is my response to a meme that I read in the Creation vs. Evolution Group on Facebook, which reads as follows:

THEISM

The belief that a god created a universe 13.75 billion light years across containing 200 billion galaxies, each of which contains an average of more than 200 billion stars, just so he could have a personal relationship with you.

Your caricature of the belief in God may apply to some theists; but not to biblical Christians. According to Scripture, the reason that God created (and why He does all things) was for His own glory.

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created. (Revelation 4:11)

In olden times, a king would manifest his majesty and supremacy by luxurious clothing and a lavish table, and by surrounding himself with impressive persons dressed in finery, in a palace richly adorned. When he traveled, it was with a retinue of many guards and companions.

This he did, both to awe his subjects into submission to his law, and to let them know that they were subjects of a great King; in whose power it was to bless those who found favor in his sight. If he was a just king (and there have been a few) His people felt secure in the order that his power and wisdom established. They could know the rules, for they did not change arbitrarily; and as long as they obeyed them, they were under the king’s protection. They could take pride in their nation and its Ruler; and were willing to fight under his banner.

God is the great king, and it is fitting that He too should display His glory – indeed, it is more appropriate for Him to do so, since He is absolutely supreme over all Kings and Lords on the whole earth; and since His glory, unlike that of earthly Kings is not stained with imperfection of any kind, in any degree. The Scripture says that He “clothes Himself” in light which no man can approach for its brightness. He surrounds Himself with an innumerable company of angels. His palace is the vastness of the heavens, and it is lit with a glorious superfluity of stars. Everything bespeaks the unique creative power, wisdom and skill with which He made the worlds.

But why would God act in such an egotistical way? It is not so. He has no need of any of these things, being all-sufficient unto Himself. He is not enriched by them; nor would he suffer loss if they disappeared. He does not need our service or our worship, nor that of the angels. How can we enrich Him; who must give us the ability before we can do so?

For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen. (Romans 11:36)

His motive for seeking His own glory is not at all like the motive of an egotistical earthly King, like Nebuchadnezzar of ancient Babylon, who said “Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my power, and for the honour of my majesty?” Besides taking too much credit, his motives were pride and selfishness, and his puny kingdom – however magnificent it may have appeared to his own eyes, and to men – was built upon oppression, theft, and bloodshed.

God is not selfish, period. All the good things that we enjoy are His gifts, lavished upon us without regard to our merit. His rain falls on the just and the unjust. He owes us nothing, but He made us capable of pleasure, and gives us the things which are capable of giving us enjoyment. Though we abuse them to the injury of ourselves and others, they are still, in themselves, good.

Why then does He make all things subservient to the manifestation of His glory? Because He wants to have a myriad of intelligent beings, who can find the greatest possible satisfaction in experiencing it. There is nothing more worthy of our admiration than God Himself; even though we cannot ever really understand who and what he is. But we can know Him as He is revealed in His works; as we can know to some extent the inner self of a great artist or author by His work.

He might have refrained from making us; but by giving us being, in the persons of our first parents, He intended to share His happiness with us. There is nothing egotistical in this.

Therefore, it is not true that God created the universe just so He could have a personal relationship with us. It is rather the case that He made us to have the privilege of knowing Him. And there is all the difference in the world in these two statements.

As for the vastness of space and the enormous number of different kinds of astral bodies, they are but reflections of His infinity, eternity, and immensity by which we are to form our conception of Him. They are but examples of His power. The creation account speaks of them almost as an afterthought. In the middle of the five verses that describe the creation of the sun and the moon, we find the phrase, “He made the stars also.” This was, by the way, accomplished within the space of but one day: so great is His power!

Your comparison, however does not take into account an important fact. The vastness of space of which you speak seems to suggest that it is somehow superior to a little creature like man just because it is so big. It is not so. Man is the crown of creation. Speaking materially, space is dead. Only on earth does life exist; and there alone lives the creature that has been dignified with the name, “the image of God”.

Angels are spirits of great dignity and power; but they are not visible, nor do they experience the world through the senses as we do. It seems obvious to me that the image of God must be visible. And he must have a connection to the world that is analogous to God’s; which he has as supreme above all other creatures. This makes man superior to the angels; and so it is that they are said to be “ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation”.

God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.” (Hebrews 1:1-4)

It is my understanding that man images God – not only in His relative supremacy, or in the impressive and beautiful configuration of his physical self, but chiefly in his works, his outward acts.

But the sons of Adam imperfectly represent God, because of their universal corruption. There has only been one perfect man – one who perfectly reveals God. Jesus Christ, God incarnate, shows us what God is really like. He is the ultimate and perfect image of the invisible God. In him, humility and majesty, manhood and Godhood meet together. He showed the love of God, a love beyond any love between humans; a self-sacrificing love. by the spoken word. His miracles showed His command of nature; calming the wind and the sea, walking on the water, changing water into wine, feeding thousands on a few loaves and fishes. And more excellent than these, He exhibited an unlimited power by His tens of thousands of healing miracles, repairing and re-making living flesh and bone!

Only the God who made the heavens and the earth could do such things as these. We see in Jesus of Nazareth the glory of God.

For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” (2Corinthians 4:6)

You would do well to consider these things, for there are great issues at stake. Your mockery of God will not be overlooked in the day of judgment. Lay aside the foolish notion that you are not a creature of God, nor subject to Him. You know in your conscience that this is not true. Bow the knee to King Jesus while you may. Your life will soon have an end. Where will you spend eternity?

Howard Douglas King

October 17, 2019

Essential Elements Of A Consistently Christian World-view

For any worldview to be considered Christian at all, it must be grounded on the written Word of God, and the revelation of the glorious person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ. But a Christian’s worldview may be inconsistent — that is, it may contain elements that are inconsistent with each other. Most of us have ideas that we have acquired during our up-bringing, that cannot be reconciled with the Bible or with Christian doctrine.

The following are some elements of biblical teaching and the teaching of historic Christianity that have often been excluded from the thinking of modern Christians because of foreign ideas that are already deeply implanted before conversion, or because they are the unspoken axioms of contemporary society. These concepts must be rooted out, and replaced by biblical concepts.

The Necessity of Authority and Subordination

The master/servant relationship is inescapable, for it is essential to cooperation and coordination of effort in any task. In the very first relationship – that of man to God, this relation necessarily obtains. The second relationship – that of man to wife – is one of authority and subordination. In the third basic relationship – that of parent to child – the inequality is even more conspicuous and necessary. The fourth basic relationship – that of master and servant – is just an extension of the authority of the father beyond the natural family to another dependent person. All other relationships in a Christian society are based on and patterned on these family relationships.

Involuntary servitude has not really been abolished – except in the household, where alone its harshest features can be ameliorated by caring, durable personal relationships. It is just limited now to impersonal secular institutions; such as prisons, armies, schools, and to a lesser extent, the workplace. Only the authority of the husband, father, and householder has been destroyed.

The Theocratic Principle

Every man and every human institution is and ought to be under the rule of God, period. He that ruleth over men must be just, ruling in the fear of God, who is the King of all kings, and the Lord of all lords.

Secularity is Not Normal

We have come to regard secular institutions and enterprises as normal; but God regards every one as insubordinate to Him, as little rebellions, as outposts of the Devil. Every institution ought to acknowledge God and serve Him.

You have the Wrong Universe

Every non-biblical worldview is not only dangerous to the souls of its adherents; but is out of touch with the most fundamental and vital realities. Christianity is not an ideology – it is the truth. If we refuse to accept the truth, it will not prevent our having to deal with it eventually. The man who jumps off a building because he believes he can fly will hit the ground hard.

Damnable Ignorance

The typical American not only does not know what he is doing; but he knows not whence he came, nor why he was made, nor what he ought to do, or where he is going. He ought to know these things. There is no barrier to his knowing these things. So, while it sounds harsh, his ignorance is damnable sin.

Unity, Diversity, and Commonality

Unity of purpose and cooperation in common action are consistent with diversity; so long as that purpose arises from ideals that are sincerely held in common by all. One King – one Law – one people.

 

Howard Douglas King

August 5, 2015

Revised April 1, 2017

The Limits of Literal Interpretation

The general principle of the literal interpretation of Scripture, which we (with all Protestants) heartily endorse, chiefly applies to historical narrative. The prophetic passages of Scripture, as well as the poetic book of psalms, often contain figurative language. This is a native feature of poetry, and a common one in prophecy. This fact has been the occasion of many differences of opinion on the interpretation of prophecy.

The general rule of literal interpretation, therefore, does not require us to interpret every word of Scripture in a literal sense. Indeed, to attempt to do so would often result in nonsense; and many times it would bring Scripture into conflict with Scripture. The correct method is to follow the Scripture’s own indications as to when it speaks in strict literalness, and when not. This is an aspect of the vital principle that Scripture interprets itself, which is equally as fundamental as that of literal interpretation.

The gospels are literal historical records of the words and deeds of Jesus. But within this is the literal record of Jesus’ sayings, in which there are very many times that He either uses figurative language, or interprets the Scriptures in a non-literal manner. This is the reason that His disciples so often did not understand Him.

As a case in point, here is a prophecy from the Old Testament:

Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. (Malachi 4:5-6)

And here is the non-literal New Testament fulfillment, according to the angel Gabriel:

And many of the children of Israel shall he [John the Baptist] turn to the Lord their God. And he [John] shall go before him [Jesus] in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” (Luke 1:16-17)

And according to Jesus Christ:

Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force. For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John. And if ye will receive it, this is Elijah, which was for to come. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.” (Matthew 11:11-15)

And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elijah must first come? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elijah truly shall first come, and restore all things. But I say unto you, That Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.“ (Matthew 17:10-13)

And they asked him, saying, Why say the scribes that Elijah must first come? And he answered and told them, Elijah verily cometh first, and restoreth all things; and how it is written of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at naught. But I say unto you, That Elijah is indeed come, and they have done unto him whatsoever they listed, as it is written of him.” (Mark 9:11-13)

It is probable that most Israelites prior to the coming of John the Baptist interpreted the prophecy of Elijah’s coming literally, and we cannot condemn them for doing so. But this is a plain instance of literal interpretation leading to an erroneous conclusion. The scribes, observing that Elijah the Tishbite had not yet appeared on the scene, thought they had an unanswerable argument against Jesus’ claim to Messiahship!

It would be wrong to demand an additional, literal fulfillment of this prophecy in the future (as some nevertheless do) on the mistaken premise that because a literal fulfillment is possible, anything less would be inadequate and contrary to the truthfulness of God. Jesus makes it plain that John is the complete fulfillment of the prophecy when he says, “this is Elijah, which was for to come”.

Besides, the prophecy was for Elijah to come before Messiah appeared. Since Jesus has already come, there is now no opportunity for a completely literal fulfillment. On the other hand, John the Baptist fulfilled the actual terms of the prophecy by his ministry, restoring true religion in Israel in preparation for the coming of the Messiah.

Finally, John was not inferior to Elijah, nor was he a less significant figure in the history of Israel. This second Elijah did no miracle, but he turned back the hearts of the children of Israel to the Lord, as the first one did (1 Kings 8:37-39); and also announced the long-awaited coming of Israel’s redeemer-king! Therefore, in sending John, God did not do less than He would have done, if He had sent the literal Elijah.

But what went ye out for to see? A prophet? Yea, I say unto you, and much more than a prophet. This is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee. For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he. (Luke 7:26-28)

By parity of reasoning, when the New Testament declares that the Kingship of Christ is to be exercised from His throne at the right hand of the Father (Acts 2:30-36) rather than from an earthly throne in Jerusalem, how can this be viewed as an inadequate fulfillment of the promise to David concerning his seed, when the power and authority of that throne in heaven includes any that David had, and is infinitely greater than that of any earthly throne? It’s as if someone promised his son a hundred dollars upon his graduation from school, and gave him a car worth ten thousand dollars instead! Who would be so mad as to complain that the promise was not fulfilled because it was not fulfilled to the letter?

The Jewish expectation of a literal, visible, earthly kingdom was not only false, but it was a main cause of their rejection of Jesus, for they were only interested in a Messiah who would come and liberate them from the Romans. They did not realize that their greater bondage was to sin and death; and that for this cause they needed most of all a spiritual redeemer. The Bible tells us that they did what they did to Christ because they did not understand the prophets; and yet Dispensationalists today follow the same wrong path!

Men and brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whosoever among you feareth God, to you is the word of this salvation sent. For they that dwell at Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they knew him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath day, they have fulfilled them in condemning him.” (Acts 13:26-27)

This error was so ingrained, that even His disciples didn’t “get it” for a long time.

But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, today is the third day since these things were done… Then he [Jesus] said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.” (Luke 24:21-27)

Dispensationalists claim that prophecy is “history written beforehand”, and claim to follow the rule, “literal unless impossible”. The tendency of the Dispensational brand of excessive literalism is to expect a future, literal fulfillment of prophecies that have already been spiritually fulfilled. The result is a complex and bizarre futuristic scenario unlike anything the historic Christian church has ever seen before.

Howard Douglas King

Why the Second Coming of Christ is Our Blessed Hope

11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; 13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; 14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works. (Tit 2:11-14)

INTRODUCTION: TITUS’ MISSION

The second chapter of this epistle begins with the charge of the Apostle Paul to Titus, who had been left in Crete with a commission to set the churches in order:

“For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee:” (Tit 1:5)

Accordingly, he sets forth in brief the qualifications for elders, closing with these words:

“Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.” (Tit 1:9)

Then he warns Titus that there will be schismatics and false teachers to contend with:

“For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:” (Tit 1:10)

He next describes their character, and gives Titus direction in his dealing with them. He is to “rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith”, and to “stop the mouths” of the deceivers by sound doctrine (see 1:9 above).

Finally, he describes the character of these men in the following terms:

“They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.” (Tit 1:16)

SOUND DOCTRINE AND SOUND PRACTICE

The division of the epistle into chapters at this point tends to obscure the fact that there is an important continuity between Chapter 1 and chapter 2. For the emphasis on sound doctrine which appears in verses 9, 11, 13, and 16 of chapter 1 recurs in the first verse of chapter 2:

But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:” (Tit 2:1)

The chief duties of Titus and the elders he appoints are to teach sound doctrine, and to inculcate the behavior that befits it. The word “become” means “to befit”. “The things which become sound doctrine” means the particulars of behavior that are consistent with the doctrines of Christianity. Call to mind the words of verse 1:16, which close the first chapter: “They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him”. There is an intimate connection between 1:16 and 2:1.

Pursuing this theme of Christian conduct, and by way of illustration, he sets forth a series of particular directions to the several classes of people, consonant with the peculiar social station and circumstances of each grouping. He addresses in turn aged men, aged women, young women, young men, and after an aside to Titus himself (urging him to maintain an exemplary deportment) bond-servants; in a few words exhorting each of them to the principal duties, and urging them to avoid the most common sins, of each class.

TWO ARGUMENTS FOR OBEDIENCE

He then enforces these directions in a long sentence that runs from verse 11 to verse 14, beginning with the following arguments:

11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;”

First, the gospel – the doctrine of the grace of God which had been preached to the Cretians – is far from being a license to sin. Paul contrasts those things that we should reject, “ungodliness and worldly lusts”, with those that we should embrace, ”we should live soberly, righteously, and godly”. This is our duty in this present world (age). Those who think that they can live as they list, and expect to be counted with the saints in heaven have got another think coming. We are going to have to change our lives to accord with the requirements of God’s word. We are going to have to listen to the preaching and submit to it – to obey; or we will never learn to live as the God of grace requires.

The second argument is that “…our Saviour Jesus Christ gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (verse 14). God did not forgive us our sins that we might continue in them; but that we might be redeemed from the power of them, and purified or sanctified from them. We are to become a “peculiar” (special) people, whose lives are full of those good works which lead men to glorify our Father in heaven (Matthew 5:16). The implication is that, if this does not take place in our lives, we prove ourselves to be among the reprobates who “profess that they know God; but in works deny him”.

All of this has been by way of background and establishing context. I hope I have demonstrated the unity of the early part of the epistle.

VERSE 13: ITS CONNECTIONS

Now, “sandwiched” between these two arguments is found the text in my title, which I will now attempt to expound:

13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

This verse is in the middle of the sentence that begins with verses 11-12 and ends at verse 14. As such, it is connected to verse 12 and verse 14. Both of these connections are important.

The first connection is this:

…we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; looking for that blessed hope

The key word is “looking”. In our day, that requires explanation. But first, let’s see what’s important about the connection. While we are living godly lives in this world (age), we are to be also looking for the appearing of our Savior and the dawn of a new age. Now this is not an additional duty, so much as a powerful encouragement to live a holy life. Suffering is a part of life for all in this sinful world; but Christians are likely to suffer an additional burden – that of persecution. We need to remember that this present evil world will come to an end, and that the temporary suffering we endure here bears no proportion to the eternal glories of the new world.

The word “looking” has nothing to do with gazing heavenward, or looking up every once in a while to see if Christ is there yet. His appearing may be a long way off. But here is the true idea. We should be “looking for” this blessed hope, like a new bride “looking for” her husband who has had to be away from her for a time. The word used here denotes expectancy. The sense is that we are to reach out towards it with our spirits, and to desire to take hold of it. We can’t do this unless we often think about it. The great consolation in the midst of all our trials is to consider that our Lord Himself is coming to perfect our redemption!

This grand expectation should be so much a part of us, that it transforms our lives. It should loosen our grip on all things merely temporal. It should make us careless of what may happen to us: whether we live long or not, whether we prosper in this world or not, whether we suffer or not. The return of our Beloved overshadows all these trivial things in the hearts of those that love Him and long for His appearing.

The second connection is this: Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ

The One who is going to “appear” is “the great God”. Jesus Christ is not just a man, or even an angel: He is God incarnate. What could be more significant than His return to earth after so many centuries of His absence?

He is also our Savior, the same one who laid down his life for us, to save us from sin. He is our friend! We should be more than eager to see Him! The eternal redemption which He obtained for us by His life and death will not be completed until He comes.

WHAT IS THE BLESSED HOPE?

Now, to the text itself, and the words “the blessed hope”. The English word “hope” can have at least four distinct meanings: the verb “to hope” can mean “to desire” something future, which may or may not happen. Second, it can mean “to be sure of”. Third, when it is a noun, it can mean “the confidence or assurance that we possess regarding a future event.” And fourth, it can mean “that which we hope for”.

The first thing to notice in our text is that “hope” here means “the thing hoped for”. It can mean nothing else, because none of the other meanings is compatible with the idea of being “looked for”.

Second, while there are commentators who differ, the consensus is that this “blessed hope” is the same thing as the “glorious appearing” of our Lord Jesus Christ. Admittedly, the Greek text may be interpreted in such a way that these are two different things. Adam Clarke, for example, says ”Some think that the blessed hope and glorious appearing mean the same thing; but I do not think so. The blessed hope refers simply to eternal glorification in general; the glorious appearing, to the resurrection of the body;” but notice that he offers no evidence or argument in support of his opinion. Isn’t it curious that Clarke finds in the words “the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ” only a reference to the resurrection?

Notice that the phrase, “The blessed hope” is not self-defining. It could mean “ eternal glorification in general” or the resurrection, which is expressly called our “hope” in the book of Acts. (23:6; 24:14) If Paul had stopped at the words, “blessed hope”, we could not be certain what is meant by it; so that it is not unreasonable to take the following clause as a definition or explanation of what that hope is: “the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”. The word “and” that connects the phrases does not necessarily imply that they are two different things, since the Greek word kai can be translated “even”.

Besides, while we have many hopes to be fulfilled in the last day, the center of all our hopes is Jesus Christ Himself, and in particular, His appearing. All of the eschatological (last days) events revolve around the return of the King, Who will set everything right!

WHY IS IT CALLED THE BLESSED HOPE?

Let’s dig a little deeper, and consider further what are the reasons why the glorious appearing of Jesus Christ is called the blessed hope.

One Reason why the second advent is called “the blessed hope” is because it marks the end of this age and the beginning of that longed-for and everlasting age which is to come. The New Testament commonly distinguishes two “worlds” or ages:

And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. “ (Matthew 12:32)

But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.“ (Mark 10:30)

Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.“ (Luke 18:30)

Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife. And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection.” (Luke 20:33-36)

Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:” (Ephesians 1:21)

For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.” (1 Timothy 4:8)

I quote these texts, rather than merely cite them because citations are often overlooked. They may not capture our attention. It may come as a shock to those who have had Dispensational teaching, and who think that there is another age (the millennium) to come between ours and the eternal state, that the New Testament knows nothing of such a thing as a “middle age” between the two. If there is a “millennium”, it can only occur within our own present age; as many of the best theologians have believed.

This is the age of hardship, of warfare, of broken hearts and broken bodies, of sin and suffering. Who would not be glad to exchange it for a world in which none of these things exists? The resurrection and eternal life are the unmerited reward of our term of labor. Is this not a sufficient reason to be looking for the day of His coming?

A Second Reason why the second advent is called “the blessed hope” is because when once that event occurs, everything moves inexorably and rapidly forward to the consummation. When Christ returns, what we know as the history of the world is at an end.

The great commission having been fulfilled, the preaching of the gospel for the conversion of sinners will be at an end. (Mathew 28:20) The celebration of the sacraments will cease, having been ordained only until “the end of the age“ (Mathew 28:19-20), “till he come”(1 Corinthians 11:26). All these things will have served their purpose.

The longsuffering of God toward the world for the sake of His elect will be ended when the last elect sinner is converted (2 Peter 3:9-10). The church will then be complete, and the work of redemption at an end. Then he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (2 Thessalo-nians 1:10). All the dead in Christ, the saints of all ages, shall rise (1 Corinthians 15:22-23), and all the living saints shall be caught up and transformed (1 Corinthians 15:51 with 1 Thessalonians 4:17). Christ shall then present His perfected bride to himself (Ephesians 5:25-27).

Immediately upon the return of Christ, a series of final events commences: the glorification of the faithful, the resurrection of the dead, the final and eternal judgment of all men, the renovation of the earth by fire, the inauguration of eternal bliss on the renewed earth. It is proper and natural then, that we should be taught to focus on the return of Christ as the event that signals the fulfillment of all our hopes.

A Third Reason is that all these other eschatological events will be the acts of the Savior Himself, performed as the completion of His Mediatorial mission of saving the world. He will personally call the dead out of the graves. (John 5:29) He Himself will judge the world. (Matthew 25:31-46; Acts 17:30-31) It is He, and none other, who will dissolve the frame of earth, and refashion it to a new perfection! (Rev. 21:5-6 – see 1:8)

When He comes, He will set all things to rights. Nothing will be right until then. And when He does it, it cannot ever be undone. Nothing less than this complete consummation of the happiness of the elect and the removal of all evil from the world forever will serve the perfect purposes of God, who has resolved upon our perfect blessedness in our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, and in Him alone!

To separate the second coming of our Lord from the other constituent parts of the consummation is nothing less than to diminish its importance, as well as its place of centrality to Christian hope. Even worse is to separate the second coming itself into two stages: the so-called “rapture” and the “revelation”. This makes the rapture the blessed hope instead of His appearing! There are many who are convinced that they are living in the last generation, and that they will be alive when Christ comes (any day now). For them, the “blessed hope” is to be alive at the rapture – to leave earth without having to die! How different is the scriptural perspective!

SUMMARY

Let us then heed the words of the Apostle, and be careful to both teach and practice those things that become the gospel; with the encouragement that the King will not disappoint our hope, for:

The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day. Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you worthy of this calling, and fulfil all the good pleasure of his goodness, and the work of faith with power: That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.” (2 Th 1:7-12)

Howard Douglas King

August 12, 2019

 

 

Daniel’s Seventieth Week

Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting right-eousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. (Dan 9:24)

Dispensationalists are adamant that the Kingdom of God, which Jesus Christ “offered” to the Jews, was postponed when they rejected Him as king, and that the postponement fits into the prophecy of Daniel above, between the 69th week and the 70th. They call this a “parenthesis”, and fit the entire “church age” into that parenthesis.

Not to dwell on the fact; but there is no such thing as a “church age”, in the sense that they mean it — that is, the span of time from Pentecost to the rapture in which the New Testament church will have existed. For the church has existed from the earliest days of history; though not in its modern form. Christ died for the church and no other; and that means everyone in history who has trusted in Him for salvation. Otherwise, the Old Testament saints must have been lost.

But there is no parenthesis between Daniel’s 69th week and the 70th that contains the entire church age. Not only does Scripture not mention any such gap, but the possibility is precluded by the fact that the “seventy weeks” are a measure of the time from the decree of Cyrus (freeing the Jews to return and re-build Jerusalem) to the kingdom of “Messiah the prince”. To arbitrarily insert or delete any period of time anywhere would change the total to something other than seventy weeks. The prophecy would then be of no use at all!

Let’s say that I told you I would complete a job for you in two weeks, and you find at the end of the two weeks that I’m not half done. You ask me why I’ve not kept my word, and I reply that I have. You ask “How so?” I answer, ”I’m sorry. Obviously there’s been a misunderstanding. I guess you didn’t know about the parenthesis.” “The parenthesis?” you say. “That’s right”, I say, “There’s a parenthesis of indefinite length between the first week and the second. I’m not sure when the second week starts, but it could be any day now – or it could be years off. No one knows for sure. Is this a problem for you?” Who would listen for a moment to such nonsense?

In American football, a chain is used to measure the distance gained by the team that is on offense. What if a part of that chain were replaced by a large rubber band? That is what the Dispensational interpretation does to this text; for it adds an undefined period in the middle of a definite measurement of time.

The Dispensationalists place the seventieth week, as I have said, after the church age, at the “rapture of the church”, when it is taken from the earth during the entire seven years. These years are said to be characterized by the “Great tribulation”, and they take the “great tribulation” of Matthew 24, etc. out of context to prove it. All of this is defended with the very poor arguments and the faulty hermeneutic that characterizes Dispensationalism.

The seventy weeks are broken down into seven weeks, sixty-two weeks, and one week. Naturally, they run consecutively; the seven, then the sixty-two, then the one final week. During the first seven weeks of years, the city and temple were rebuilt. Then, after sixty-two more weeks, Messiah made His public appearance (at His baptism), exercised His ministry, and performed His redeeming work, which culminated in His being “cut off” in the final week of the seventy, having established the New Covenant just before His death.

The prophecy had its fulfillment at the end of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews: the restoration of Jerusalem(v.25), the building of the second temple (that took exactly 49 years), the advent of Christ, his redeeming work (v.24), and succeeding events (v.27). Jesus the Messiah was “cut off” after the sixty-ninth week, that is, in the seventieth week. There is therefore no remaining week of prophetic time to be fulfilled in the future.

Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after [the] threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off…” (Daniel 9:24-26)

The prophecy does not say how long after the sixty-ninth week it would be when Messiah would be cut off, but it was obviously within that week. That is all the prophecy requires. The time period is not measured in years; such that we must calculate the number of years to the end of the seventy weeks, that is 490; and say that the predicted events must run right up to the 490th year. The units of measure are hebdads, weeks of years — not years as such.

The phrase “unto the Messiah the Prince” probably refers to the time of His baptism, when he was about thirty years of age. This is when his forerunner, John the baptist, told the world that this man was the Messiah, when the Holy Spirit descended upon Him like a dove, and when the Father gave testimony that Jesus was His beloved son:

Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. And after [the] threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off…” (Daniel 9:24-26)

Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene, Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.

And he came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins; As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways shall be made smooth; And all flesh shall see the salvation of God…

Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened, And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.” (Luke 3:1-6;21-22)

It is important that we notice that this particular date is marked in Luke’s gospel with greater precision than the date of any other event in the New Testament. Why, but because it is the year when the sixty-nine weeks of Daniel were ended? It would be strange indeed if it were only the beginning of John’s ministry that was so carefully marked, and Jesus the Messiah’s appearance was not! As the text suggests, Jesus was baptized near the beginning of John’s ministry:

Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized…”

Besides, John’s ministry probably only lasted about six months (A.T. Robertson’s Harmony of the Gospels), so the baptism of Christ likely took place in the year so carefully defined here.

The evangelist would have been very conscious of the predicted time when Messiah was to appear. The Jews kept a precise chronology. Jesus Himself, at the beginning of His ministry, preached “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15). What “time” was fulfilled? Did Jesus merely mean the time fixed by God in His secret decree? Or was He not rather pointing to a concrete and verifiable fact, which would enable His hearers to authenticate His person and mission? If Jesus had not appeared at the predicted time, the Jews would certainly have known it, and would have used it against Him! There was only this one prediction in the Jewish Bible of the time of the coming of Messiah. So when Paul spoke of “the fullness of the time”, when “God sent forth His son” (Galatians 4:4), it is probable that He too had Daniel’s prophecy in mind.

Therefore we believe that the first sixty-nine weeks (483 years) of Daniel’s prophecy reach to the baptism of Christ and the beginning of His ministry. Since Jesus’ ministry continued for about three and a half years, it follows that the crucifixion of our Lord occurred at about the halfway point in the seventieth week of Daniel. It is clear that His death served “to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness”. Opinions differ as to what the other phrases “to seal up the vision and prophecy,” and “to anoint the most Holy” refer to, but whatever view we take of these items, it is certain that they must also have been fulfilled within the seventieth week.

What becomes then of the Dispensationalists’ “parenthesis theory”? The seventy weeks have long since run out! There is no remaining seven year period to be pushed far into the future. And it follows that there is no “parenthesis” during which the kingdom was postponed. Jesus was born a king. In His ministry, He announced that the kingdom was at hand. And He inaugurated His kingdom when He ascended into heaven to sit at the right hand of God.

For further study, see Calvin’s Commentaries on the Prophet Daniel, or Mauro’s exhaustive study, The Seventy Weeks of Daniel.

THY KINGDOM COME

THY KINGDOM COME

The Lord’s Prayer and the Future of Christianity

After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. (Matthew 6:9-10)

From the beginning of this age, the prayer our Lord taught to his disciples has been a prominent part of the private and public worship of Christians all over the world. We use it as a prayer, reciting it in our liturgy every Lord’s Day. Others teach that it is a model prayer, and use it as a framework to organize or to construct their own prayers. Only strict Dispensationalists reject its use altogether, claiming it belongs to another dispensation. So it is fitting that we have a clear understanding of what it means. For the mere repetition of the words does not matter if we don’t understand what our Lord meant us to pray for, and what answer to expect.

Calvin likens this prayer to the Decalogue; in that it is composed of two parts, the first having to do with God, and the second with man. The heart of the prayer lies in the first three petitions, and that will be the subject for our consideration today. This is because of its greater importance, and also because there is very little disagreement as to the meaning of the second three.

In the original, the verbs are deliberately located first in the sentences, for emphasis. The Greek word order is:

Hallowed be thy name!

Let come thy kingdom!

Be done thy will!

The verbs of these three petitions are all aorist imperatives. What does this mean? It means that they are couched in the form of peremptory requests! There is the greatest urgency about these three requests. One should never mumble through them, half asleep, not caring what he is saying, nor considering what they mean. They are to be spoken with understanding and passionate desire for their fulfillment.

This brings us to the heart of the matter. What are we supposed to be asking for? Some have found in these words nothing more than pious aspiration. The JFB Commentary is an example of this:

…we incline to think that the aspiration which we are taught in this beautiful petition to breathe forth has no direct reference to any such organic fulfillment, and is only the spontaneous and resistless longing of the renewed soul – put into words – to see the whole inhabited earth in entire conformity to the will of God. It asks not if ever it shall be – or if ever it can be – in order to pray this prayer. It must have its holy yearnings breathed forth, and this is just the bold yet simple expression of them.”

In this view, Jesus gave the church a prayer to pray repeatedly, continuously through the centuries and millennia with no expectation that it will ever be fulfilled! When we pray it, we are merely “venting” our godly desires. But would it not be strange indeed, if we were given such vehement language to express desires that God has not promised to gratify. In fact, if the pessimists are right, and God has revealed that the church will never achieve universal dominion, would it not be insubordination, even rebellion on our part to demand this of God?

Another view is that its only fulfillment is the ultimate victory of Christ’s kingdom at the end of the world. Granted, that is and must be our fervent desire and hope as Christians. The perfection of the eternal state is what we long for; but what about in the meantime? Are we really to believe that the only model prayer Christ ever gave us left out any reference to the state of His kingdom in this world? That there is nothing in the prayer about God’s current programme? That our devotion can be complete without a sense of mission and a desire for the flourishing of the kingdom of God?

Martin Luther did not expect the gospel to be victorious in the world; in fact, he expected the world to end in his day. But he did have the good sense to recognize the relevance of this prayer to the present age. In his Small Catechism, he writes:

The Second Petition – Thy kingdom come.

What does this mean? The kingdom of God certainly comes by itself without our prayer, but we pray in this petition that it may come to us also.

How does God’s kingdom come? God’s kingdom comes when our heavenly Father gives us His Holy Spirit, so that by His grace we believe His holy Word and lead godly lives here in time and there in eternity.

The Third Petition – Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

What does this mean? The good and gracious will of God is done even without our prayer, but we pray in this petition that it may be done among us also.

How is God’s will done? God’s will is done when He breaks and hinders every evil plan and purpose of the devil, the world, and our sinful nature, which do not want us to hallow God’s name or let His kingdom come; and when He strengthens and keeps us firm in His Word and faith until we die. This is His good and gracious will.

But Luther limits the scope of the petition to the personal without warrant. The second generation of Reformers, who built on the foundation laid by Luther, gave a more adequate explanation of the prayer. John Calvin expresses the optimism of faith implied in this petition:

By this prayer we ask that He may remove all hinderances, and may bring all men under His dominion, and may lead them to meditate on the heavenly life… We therefore pray that God would exert His power, both by the Word and by the spirit, that the whole world may willingly submit to Him… There is still another way in which God reigns; and that is, when he overthrows his enemies, and compels them, with Satan their head, to yield a reluctant subjection to his authority, “till they all be made his footstools” (Hebrews 10:13).

The substance of this prayer is, that God would enlighten the world by the light of his Word, — would form the hearts of men, by the influences of his Spirit, to obey his justice, and would restore to order, by the gracious exercise of his power, all the disorder that exists in the world. Now, he commences his reign by subduing the desires of our flesh. Again, as the kingdom of God is continually growing and advancing to the end of the world, we must pray every day that it may come: for to whatever extent iniquity abounds in the world, to such an extent the kingdom of God, which brings along with it perfect righteousness, is not yet come.” (Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, p. 320)

As to the expression highlighted, “the kingdom of God is continually growing and advancing to the end of the world”. Calvin gave us a fuller and more explicit statement in the preface to his Institutes of the Christian Religion. This work, written intentionally to vindicate the martyr church of France, he dedicated to his sovereign, Francis, King of France. Listen as he exhorts the King to defend the cause of the Protestants being persecuted in his kingdom:

“Your duty, most serene Prince, is, not to shut either your ears or mind against a cause involving such mighty interests as these: how the glory of God is to be maintained on the earth inviolate, how the truth of God is to preserve its dignity, how the kingdom of Christ is to continue amongst us compact and secure. The cause is worthy of your ear, worthy of your investigation, worthy of your throne.”

The characteristic of a true sovereign is, to acknowledge that, in the administration of his kingdom, he is a minister of God. He who does not make his reign subservient to the divine glory, acts the part not of a king, but a robber. He, moreover, deceives himself who anticipates long prosperity to any kingdom which is not ruled by the sceptre of God, that is, by his divine word. For the heavenly oracle is infallible which has declared, that “where there is no vision the people perish” (Prov. 29:18).

Let not a contemptuous idea of our insignificance dissuade you from the investigation of this cause. We, indeed, are perfectly conscious how poor and abject we are: in the presence of God we are miserable sinners, and in the sight of men most despised–we are (if you will) the mere dregs and off-scourings of the world, or worse, if worse can be named: so that before God there remains nothing of which we can glory save only his mercy, by which, without any merit of our own, we are admitted to the hope of eternal salvation: and before men not even this much remains, since we can glory only in our infirmity, a thing which, in the estimation of men, it is the greatest ignominy even tacitly to confess.

But our doctrine must stand sublime above all the glory of the world, and invincible by all its power, because it is not ours, but that of the living God and his Anointed, whom the Father has appointed King, that he may rule from sea to sea, and from the rivers even to the ends of the earth; and so rule as to smite the whole earth and its strength of iron and brass, its splendour of gold and silver, with the mere rod of his mouth, and break them in pieces like a potter’s vessel; according to the magnificent predictions of the prophets respecting his kingdom (Dan. 2:34; Isaiah 11:4; Psalm 2:9).

After Calvin, this optimistic view of the future of Christ’s kingdom was generally adopted among the Reformed churches, and held by them for many generations. It was propagated in the notes of the Geneva Bible. And it was the view expressed in the Westminster Standards.

The Westminster Larger Catechism distinguishes several aspects to Christ’s kingship in the answer to question 45:

Q. 45. How doth Christ execute the office of a king?
A. Christ executeth the office of a king, [1] in calling out of the world a people to himself, and giving them officers, laws, and censures, by which he visibly governs them; [2] in bestowing saving grace upon his elect, rewarding their obedience, and correcting them for their sins, preserving and supporting them under all their temptations and sufferings, [3] restraining and overcoming all their enemies, and powerfully ordering all things for his own glory, and their good; [4] and also in taking vengeance on the rest, who know not God, and obey not the gospel.

With the first coming of Christ, the kingdom has come, as predicted, yet not in its fullest sense. Christ has all the authority now, but He must fight an age-long and bloody war to bring the rebellious nations under His scepter. His enemies must be made His footstool (Psalm 110:1). For now, He rules in the midst of His enemies (Psalm 110:2). With this understanding, we are now ready to appreciate the Westminster Divines’ comprehensive and detailed answer to our question:

Q. 191. What do we pray for in the second petition [of the Lord’s prayer]?

A. In the second petition, (which is, Thy kingdom come,) acknowledging ourselves and all mankind to be by nature under the dominion of sin and Satan, we pray, that the kingdom of sin and Satan may be destroyed, the gospel propagated throughout the world, the Jews called, the fullness of the Gentiles brought in; the church furnished with all gospel-officers and ordinances, purged from corruption, countenanced and maintained by the civil magistrate: that the ordinances of Christ may be purely dispensed, and made effectual to the converting of those that are yet in their sins, and the confirming, comforting, and building up of those that are already converted: that Christ would rule in our hearts here, and hasten the time of his second coming, and our reigning with him forever: and that he would be pleased so to exercise the kingdom of his power in all the world, as may best conduce to these ends.

Later Reformed scholars, until the late 19th century, shared this optimistic understanding of Scripture, and entertained the hope of the ultimate triumph of the gospel.

John Gill comments on Matthew 6:10:

“In this petition the disciples were taught to pray for the success of the Gospel, both among Jews and Gentiles; for the conversion of God’s elect, in which the kingdom of God would greatly appear, to the destruction of the kingdom of Satan, and the abolition of the kingdom of the beast, in the latter day; which will usher in the kingdom, of the mediator, he will receive from his Father, and this will terminate in the kingdom of glory: in a word, not the kingdom of nature and providence is meant, which always was; but the kingdom of heaven, which was at hand, nay had taken place, though as yet was not very visible, and which is spiritual in the hearts of God’s people, Jews and Gentiles; and which will appear exceeding glorious in the latter day, and at last be swallowed up in the ultimate glory; all which must be very desirable by the sincere lovers of Jesus Christ.”

Albert Barnes agrees with this perspective:

Thy kingdom come” – The word “kingdom” here means “reign.” (See note, Matthew 3:2.) The petition is the expression of a wish that God may reign everywhere; that his laws may be obeyed; and especially that the gospel of Christ may be advanced everywhere, until the world shall be filled with his glory.

Thy will be done” – The will of God is, that people should obey his law, and be holy. The word will, here, has reference to his law, and to what would be acceptable to him. To pray, then, that his will may be done, on earth as in heaven, is to pray that his law, his revealed will, may be obeyed and loved. His law is perfectly obeyed in heaven, and his true children most ardently desire and pray that it may also be obeyed on the earth.

The object of these three first petitions, is, that God’s name should be glorified and his kingdom established; and by being placed first, we learn that his glory and kingdom are of more consequence than our wants, and that these should be first in our hearts and petitions before a throne of grace.

Even John Wesley, who cannot be considered “Reformed” summarizes thus:

Thy kingdom come” – May thy kingdom of grace come quickly, and swallow up all the kingdoms of the earth: may all mankind, receiving thee, O Christ, for their king, truly believing in thy name, be filled with righteousness, and peace, and joy; with holiness and happiness, till they are removed hence into thy kingdom of glory, to reign with thee for ever and ever.

An official confessional document of the Reformed Presbyterian Church reads:

We believe that a period approaches, in which the kingdom of Christ shall triumph over all opposition, and have a universal diffusion, influence, and prosperity. The Romish antichrist shall be destroyed, and shall cease not only to exert a malignant influence of any kind, on the ecclesiastical and social institutions of those countries where it has prevailed, but to have an organised existence on the face of the earth. The Jews shall be converted to Christianity, and added to the church. The greater fullness of the gentiles shall be brought in. Mohammedan and Pagan nations shall embrace the religion of Jesus, and all mankind shall possess the knowledge of revealed truth. There is reason to believe, that the truth shall be felt in its illuminating, regenerating, and sanctifying efficacy, by the greater number for those who process it.(sic) Knowledge, love, holiness, and peace shall extensively prevail, under the copious effusions of the Holy Spirit. Arts, sciences, literature, and wealth shall be consecrated to the service of Christ. The social institutions of men shall be erected and administered under the influence of scriptural principle. Oppression and tyranny shall terminate; wars shall cease from the earth, and the nations be united in peace. The inhabitants of the world shall be exceedingly multiplied, and pure undefiled religion shall exert supreme dominion over the hearts and minds of men, and diffuse universal felicity. This happy period shall be of long duration. It will be succeeded by a general defection from truth and holiness, and the prevalence of irreligion and crime, which will immediately precede the second coming of the Son of man from heaven.” (Testimony of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in Scotland, 1842. Pages 348 – 350). [I have omitted the Scripture proof texts to save space. HDK]

Enough has been said to show that the expectation of victory is a part of our Reformed heritage; and that to pray in the expectation of that victory was regarded by our Reformed forefathers as a Christian duty. And I hope I have shown that, when we pray the Lord’s Prayer, we are not asking God to do what we know He has no intention of doing; but rather what He has promised to do, what He intends to do, and what He shall certainly do.

The Reformers and their successors dared to dream of converting whole nations, all of Europe, even the world! They dared to strive for and pray for great things, knowing that, however small and weak they were, the work did not depend on them, but upon God, who would surely fulfill His promises to those who were faithful and obedient. May the Lord give us great faith, that we may show ourselves worthy of the priceless heritage bestowed upon us by a gracious providence; that we may attempt great things for God, and expect great things from God!

Howard Douglas King

 

Why The Left Is Willing To Run Extreme Candidates For Office

Even When it Means Losing Elections

The Left doesn’t need to win elections right now, as much as it needs to make socialism seem to be an attractive option versus the status quo. The left is playing the long game, and in the end they must win; for the so-called”right” is only interested in maintaining the the established order by putting its men in the critical offices. The do-nothing Republicans already lost the mid-term elections; and they are going to lose a lot more.

What do I mean by the Left playing the long game? They already have control of the education system. From early childhood to young adulthood, they exercise authority over that child more than most parents do. They have his eyes and ears, to fill with the ideas and images that support their worldview. If the child goes to college, the icing will be spread on the cake that they have already baked; and they will be propagandized and activated as devoted enemies of the America we love.

Going farther back, the teachers who train teachers who train your children and young adults are Marxists, and the typical university is a Marxist institution. Your child doesn’t have a prayer against such a prolonged and orchestrated attack. He will reject his parents’ values and side with those who promise hope and change. He cannot do otherwise. And his rejection will be sincere and passionate.

That is why the voter base of the Democrats is growing, in spite of the fact that so many parents are not Leftists. It will continue to grow for other reasons:

To state the obvious — sane, practical, patriotic, conservative people who know that socialism is evil are dying off, while the ignorant young are increasing.

The mainline media are as far Left as the universities, and their power to keep young and aware socialists — your children — updated on the current party line concerning all events and persons is formidable. Against these two towers there can be no victory.

But let’s not overlook the legal system, which has already been renovated by secular humanists, and the Christian foundations of the old American law thoroughly undermined. Perpetuating and extending the humanist influence is the congress, which has been the propagator and promoter of liberalized laws that favor Marxist institutions and grants money outright to them. In addition, the judges are trained in Marxist government schools, universities and law schools.

Professed conservative politicians have failed to implement conservative policies, which would make our problems diminish; or even to slow the progress of America’s liberalization which has been going on since at least FDR. It is not hard to make the young see that the world is messed up, and needs radical change; when the Leftist agenda is continually making things worse, while Leftists always blame the other side for the failure of their own policies.

Parents refuse to see that this is going on, because they see no option to government education that is not costly in money or time. Government education has the ultimate advantage: it is free. So they turn a blind eye to the process of mis-education that is destroying their children and our society.

Before long, these Marxist candidates, who are mostly women or blacks or both, to make them more attractive to young Marxist voters, will be winning by landslides; and there will be little or no resistance left. The horrors of bloody atheistic Marxism will no longer be a fear, but a reality. This is what our complacency has been and is creating. God help us; for no one else can!

 

Howard Douglas King

November 23, 2018